As time . . . . . . . . . . . . ( l ) , the power of newspapers seems to be on the . . . . . . . . . . . . (2). This is odd because in the relatively . . . . . . . . . . . (3) past people were predicting that the influence of the written word would diminish in . . . . . . . . (4) proportion to the rate of increase of the spoken word and moving image through TV and video. The Internet, cable and satellite television, Tele text and multi-media computers in . . . . . . . . . . . (5) other home should surely have . . . . . . .. . (6) for newspapers by now, particularly alongside a perceptible resurgence in the audiences for news-carrying radio stations. How have these organs survived, let alone . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 7 ) , particularly on a Sunday? Why do people who have seen a football or tennis . . . . . . . . . . (8) live or on the small screen rush the next day to read a . . . . . . . . . . . (9) version of it in four or five columns which surely cannot mean more to the reader than that self-same viewer of the previous afternoon or evening? Why would anyone who has seen a film and formed a . . . . (10) irnpression of it the following day read a review of the . . . . . . . . (11 ) film in a newspaper? To see if s/he is right? Isn't that what friends are for? Don't we have colleagues for just that purpose - to see if our ideas on any . . . . . . . . . . . . (12) song, film or program tally with others'? What is this product that . . . . . . . . . . . . (13) of not much more than outrageous headlines, wayward comment, subjective editorials and hyperbolic sports pages still doing in our lives? It seems for the time . . . . . . . . . . . . (14) to be leading a charmed life. When it finally goes, though, many may come to mourn its . . . . . . . . (15). GIẢI THÍCH ĐÁP ÁN VỚI NHÉ